Covid Vaccine Information and Considerations
Thoughts on the Vaccine from People Who Didn’t Get the Vaccine:
Recent Information
- As time has gone on, the virus has gotten weaker consistently, and that is the way of viruses. They start out strong, and less transmissible, and grow weaker and more transmissible over time. It is on the same level as it’s sister—the common cold. Omicron and later (sub) variants have been very mild.
- The vaccine has become almost entirely ineffective over time: even after being vaccinated, people had to wear a mask, and were still symptomatic, and still being hospitalized.
- The vaccine is still not fully-tested, and has many, many insufficiently understood side effects, like prion diseases, myocarditis, and pericarditis.
- The government has such a long track record of lying to its people in the interest of enriching itself, and its friends.
Links and Articles
- COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 42 - from the UK Health Security Agency (archival copy)
- Epoch Times: Heart Inflammation More Prevalent Among Vaccinated Than Unvaccinated: Study
- Epoch Times: Pfizer Hired 600 Employees Due to ‘Large Increase of Adverse Event Reports’: Document
A Young Nurse’s Thoughts
From Experience in the Nursing Home
- The precautions we took contradicted almost everything I’d been taught about infection control, and contradicted what we’d done in the past to manage infection. Especially in making healthy people quarantine.
- The rules were inconsistent and often changed weekly (sometimes more, and sometimes less rapidly). They frequently favored vaccinated staff while doing exceedingly little to actually prevent infection. For example, unvaccinated people could not feed residents, but they could provide all other normal care for them that required even more close/personal contact (among many others examples).
- Earlier this year, at least seven residents I knew who’d had both injections and a booster all tested positive for COVID (some of whom had the infection a few months prior).
- Our rules for testing are stringent for unvaccinated staff, but not vaccinated, even though the vaccinated are more likley to spread COVID. Again, infection control hardly seems to be the concern.
- Twelve residents within the facility died of COVID back in November. Several others contracted it in the facility around that time and died in the hospital. I don’t believe a single one of them was given Ivermectin or HCQ.
Looking at the Outside World
- Everything they told us to do focused on avoiding contracting the illness. There was little or no info on how to manage it once you got it.
- Staying inside, masking, disinfecting everything, and avoiding others weakens the immune system, and makes us more susceptible to severe illness when we do get sick (and not just COVID, but all kinds of other sicknesses). Again, basic principles we’ve always employed for illness, preventing infection, and staying healthy were totally ignored.
- There was a huge focus on how unprecedented, dangerous, and surprising the situation was, etc. There was no need to reinvent science for this one, but we did.
- The urgency of everything far exceeded the actual threat, and died down so quickly that it seems impossible safety was ever a concern.
- The same people who tell us that the vaccine is safe and for our health also tell us that abortion is safe and for women’s health. That doesn’t add up.
Regarding the Vaccine Itself
- Unlike every other vaccine I've seen, we are told repeatedly that "the risks outweigh the benefits."
- It is extremely lucrative for the pharmaceutical companies to convince us it's safe and necessary, and for them to get approval to administer it to small children (the more people they can give it to, the better for them).
- We are told it's "dangerous" to question the vaccine's efficacy, and that evidence contradicting the narrative is "misinformation."
- The cases of stillbirths, myocarditis, and other instances of sudden and severe illness occurring after vaccination is overwhelming. And frequently ignored and pushed under the rug.
An Unnecessary Religious Exemption Letter
The Employer Never Asked for Requests
I have been a Christian for many years, and have been a member of my church—Sovereign Grace Baptist Church of Topeka, Kansas—since 2001. I am convinced of the authority and infallibility of the Holy Bible. I believe that it is the revealed will of God, and must be followed in all things. Accordingly, it informs my behavior with regard to my employment as much as any other.
The commandment against unlawful killing (i.e. “Thou shalt not kill”) is one of the Ten Commandments (found in Deuteronomy 5 and Exodus 20). The law of God is comprehensive, requiring more duties and injunctions than are expressly stated in the whole of the Ten Commandments. Psalm 119:96b says, “I have seen an end of all perfection; but thy commandment is exceeding broad.” The Westminster Larger Catechism (an extensive commentary on the doctrines of Scripture) states the following regarding the Sixth Commandment:
The sins forbidden in the sixth commandment are, all taking away the life of ourselves, or of others, except in case of public justice, lawful war, or necessary defense; the neglecting or withdrawing the lawful and necessary means of preservation of life… and whatsoever else tends to the destruction of the life of any.
Having learned that these drug manufacturers (Johnson and Johnson [Janssen], Pfizer [with BioNTech]], and Moderna) all use fetal cells in the development of this mRNA inoculation gives me concern, and reservations. Taking the vaccine for this reason troubles me. I do not like it, and I think that it is unethical in the extreme. Nevertheless, it is not the chief reason that I have grave reservations about taking this treatment.
I am concerned enough about my own health, given the limited animal testing, the ad-hoc/on-the-fly human testing, and the unmitigated violation of the first requirement of the Nuremburg Code (not to mention other violations):
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
Additionally, there are numerous findings of pericarditis, prion diseases, exceedingly high rates of stillbirth, decreased fertility, and other diseases.
And I mean with great soberness to state my conviction in this matter: I know that you do not owe me employment. And I am in no position to demand it. I have a great desire to remain employed at █████████. I am so convinced of this that if I am not granted an exemption, I will not take the vaccination in order to remain employed. And I do not say that as a matter of vain boasting, but sincere conviction.
Given my view of the sixth commandment and its reasoned implications, I believe that to take the vaccine would violate the sixth commandment—and less importantly—my conscience. Given my concern for my own well-being, and to a lesser extent, the use of aborted fetal cells (in this and other vaccines), I say with Luther, "To go against conscience is neither right nor safe. Here I stand, I can do no other, so help me God. Amen."
Addendum
Additionally, given our government’s history of untrustworthiness, as with the following historic accounts, I do not trust them to have my best interests in mind:
- Black Americans were "treated" by the US Public Health Service in a syphilis study (the "Tuskegee Syphilis Study"), being told that they were all receiving treatment, when in fact many of them were receiving placebos—25% of whom died. That experiment went on for 40 years. Read that again: That experiment went on for 40 years.
- Our entry into World War I was ill-conceived, and arguably led to the rise of Hitler through the otherwise unlikely imposition of grievous reparations upon the Germans. Over 50,000 US troops, totalling over 100,000 Americans died in that war.
- Our entry into World War II was both provoked and avoidable. We starved the Japanese of petroleum in solidarity with the Chinese. We were belligerents, exchanging planes with the UK for land, when we were ostensibly neutral. We allowed American civilians to board the HMS Lusitania (a belligerent ship that was carrying armaments to the Brits) knowing that the Germans had warned that they were going to attack that ship on its return voyage across the Atlantic. We allowed many people to die in the attack on Pearl Harbor, indicating falsely that we didn't know that the Japanese were going to attack. Nearly 420,000 Americans died in that war, around 12,000 were civilians. My father's father spent almost the entire war in a Japanese POW camp after marching in the Bataan Death March on the strength of that lie. 80% of the folks in that march died. A larger percentage of their dwindling number died in the "hell ships" that carried them to the mainland of Japan.
- Our entry into Vietnam was based on the lie that we were attacked at the Gulf of Tonkin. Between 400,000 and 1.1 million US and US-led troops and civilians were killed in that "police action".
- Our entry into the first Gulf War was based on propaganda that Kuwait was attacked in an unprovoked way though they were stealing oil from Iraq by drilling into their reserves. And the account that was used to foment that incursion on their behalf (namely the tipping of the baby incubators in the hospital by Iraqi troops was falsified). Nearly 300 Americans died; around half were American civilians.
- Our entry into Iraq War (2003) was based on false reports that Iraq had chemical weapons (Weapons of Mass Destruction or "WMD"). U.S. Troop deaths number around 4,400.
Notably absent in these numbers are the wounded, and the MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of non-Americans that were killed. Note that we began (as in Iraq and the Gulf War) or were chiefly responsible for maintaining the war effort (as in Vietnam and the unmentioned Korean conflict, Kosovo, Bosnia, multiple incursions into Somalia, Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere across the globe). Our government has played fast and loose with the facts in the interest of enriching the military-industrial complex. They have done the same in the medical realm, enriching the likes of Pfizer for years with the Education-Medical-Industrial complex. I doubt their claims of efficacy and safety, and their great care to push us so hard to take these vaccines has only made me trust them less, not more.
Our government has proven untrustworthy again and again. I do not trust them to implement a vaccine program. They cannot honestly conduct a war. I would challenge you to name me a war that was entered into without duplicity in the last 150 years. And really, 200.
I was a soldier. I didn't know these things when I joined, coming from a military family: my dad and his dad, my mom and her dad, my step-dad and his dad, my step-mom and her dad. And that says nothing of my aunt and uncles who were members of the armed forces and Coast Guard. I don't trust my government to send me into war. I don't trust them to send my children into war. I don't trust them to treat or vaccinate me. And I really don't trust them to treat or vaccinate my children. I did trust them regarding vaccinations before 2020.
I have a duty to protect my family, and myself in the interest of caring for my family. Our government (by way of the FDA) has stringent, onerous, and time-intensive requirements for drugs to be approved. They are less stringent for continuous vaccines like influenza, but the initial vaccine has to be properly tested with greater rigor. This "vaccine" is not a vaccine in the sense that vaccines have been defined historically (pre-2020). It is a gene therapy. Rather than teaching your body to produce antibodies by introducing an attenuated or dead form of the virus, it causes you to produce something that mimics the coronavirus that your own body can then learn to protect itself from. It's amazing. It's a feat of science. But it is not a vaccine. And it needs to be tested more thoroughly. And we are being experimented upon in defiance of the law, and at great risk to our health, and in opposition to the commandment against unlawful killing and its reasoned implications.